Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Convegno 2025 della Divisione Didattica

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Chimica nella Scuola n. 2 2026

Insegnare la molecular dynamics come pratica interpretativa in un contesto di Team-Based Learning

  • Renato Lombardo
Submitted
16 June 2026
Published
16 June 2026

Abstract

Molecular dynamics is increasingly introduced in chemistry and life science courses, yet students often experience difficulties in interpreting simulation outputs and relating different descriptors to a coherent explanation. In this context, molecular dynamics can be approached as an interpretative practice rather than as a set of techniques. The experience described here was implemented in a graduate-level physical chemistry course for biotechnology students within a Team-Based Learning framework, designed to promote discussion, comparison of viewpoints and collective decision making based on available evidence. Particular attention is given to how students move from a descriptive reading of individual indicators to a more integrated interpretation through group interaction. The implementation and the observed learning dynamics are discussed, highlighting both strengths and critical aspects. The role of guided questioning, also supported by AI, is considered in relation to the development of students’ ability to construct and justify interpretations. The experience suggests that focusing on interpretation and decision making can contribute to making physical chemistry more meaningful and closer to scientific practice.

References

  1. [1] L. A. E. Tibell, C.-J. Rundgren, Educational challenges of molecular life science: characteristics and implications for education and research, CBE Life Sci. Educ., 2010, 9(1), 25-33 (https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-09-0055).
  2. [2] A. H. Johnstone, Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem, J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 1991, 7(2), 75-83 (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x).
  3. [3] D. E. Elmore, Why should biochemistry students be introduced to molecular dynamics simulations - and how can we introduce them?, Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., 2016, 44(2), 118-123 (https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20943).
  4. [4] Multiple representations in chemical education, in Models and Modeling in Science Education (Eds., J. K. Gilbert, D. Treagust), Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2009, Vol. 4 (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8).
  5. [5] N. J. Nersessian, Creating scientific concepts, MIT Press, 2010.
  6. [6] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, et al., Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2014, 111(23), 8410-8415 (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111).
  7. [7] M. T. H. Chi, Active-constructive-interactive: a conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities, Top. Cogn. Sci., 2009, 1(1), 73-105 (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x).
  8. [8] L. K. Michaelsen, M. Sweet, The essential elements of Team-Based Learning, New Dir. Teach. Learn., 2008, 2008(116), 7-27 (https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.330)
  9. [9] Y. L. Weng, S. R. Naik, N. Dingelstad, M. R. Lugo, S. Kalyaanamoorthy, A. Ganesan, Molecular dynamics and in silico mutagenesis on the reversible inhibitor-bound SARS-CoV-2 main protease complexes reveal the role of lateral pocket in enhancing the ligand affinity, Sci. Rep., 2021, 11(1), 7429 (https://doi.org/10.1038).
  10. [10] E. Kasneci, K. Sessler, S. Küchemann, et al., ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education, Learn. Individ. Differ., 2023, 103, 102274 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274).
  11. [11] A. C. Graesser, P. Chipman, B. C. Haynes, A. Olney, AutoTutor: an intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue, IEEE Trans. Educ., 2005, 48(4), 612-618 (https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2005.856149).
  12. [12] K. VanLehn, The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems, Educ. Psychol., 2011, 46(4), 197-221 (https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369).
  13. [13] A. M. Maggio, R. Lombardo, D. Chillura Martino, La formazione e l’aggiornamento dei docenti chimici dell’Università di Palermo: le attività del Progetto Mentore e del TLC-CIMDU, CnS, 2024, 4, 4-16 (https://chimicanellascuola.it/index.php/cns/article/view/198/332).
  14. [14] G. Scaccianoce, O. Scialdone, R. Lombardo, I dieci anni del Progetto Mentore all’Università degli Studi di Palermo, in Mentoring e Didattica Universitaria, Collana del TLC-CIMDU, Palermo University Press, Palermo, 2024, pp. 159-163.

Most read articles by the same author(s)