Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Metodologie didattiche per l'Università

Vol. 5 No. 5 (2024): Chimica nella Scuola n. 5 2024

Come cambia il rapporto con la chimica e le scienze, dalle superiori all’università? Una proposta di indagine

Submitted
27 January 2025
Published
27-01-2025

Abstract

Despite growing attention towards the development of forms of orientation that effectively support the transition to tertiary training courses, there is a lack, at a national level, of investigations that shed light on the factors that decisively influence the choice of scientific studies, including “informal” cultural inputs and social influences of students. This work presents the proposal for a wide-ranging investigation, based on a survey structure, led from November 2023 to February 2024, about the perception of university students regarding the real motivations that led them to embrace a degree in the scientific field. The results, collected from a large group of students, highlight an articulated and complex picture, that suggests extending this type of investigation, refining orientation strategies and supporting teaching approaches through the first years of higher degree studies.

References

  1. E. Ghibaudi, F. Turco, G. Ieluzzi, Luigi Cerruti: la chimica come impegno civile. Rend. Acc. Naz. Sci., Memorie e Rendiconti di Chimica, Fisica, Matematica e Scienze Naturali, 2022, 140°, Vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 137-147.
  2. Decreto del Ministro dell’Istruzione e del Merito, 22 dicembre 2022, n. 328, concernente l’adozione delle Linee guida per l’orientamento, relative alla riforma 1.4 “Riforma del sistema di orientamento”, nell’ambito della Missione 4 - Componente 1- del Piano nazionale di ripresa e resilienza.
  3. A. Tomlinson, A. Simpson, C. Killingback, Student expectations of teaching and learning when starting university: a systematic review, J. Furth. High. Educ., 2023, 47(8), 1054-1073 (https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=10.1080%2F0309877X.2023.2212242&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8).
  4. V. L. O’Donnell, M. Kean, G. Stevens, Student transitions in higher education: concepts, theories and practices, in Higher Education Academy. Transforming teaching inspiring learning, University of the West of Scotland, 2016 (https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/resources/student_transition_ in_higher_education_1568037357.pdf).
  5. S. Zappoli, E. Scavetta, Facing the Didactic Emergency During Covid-19 Pandemic in an Analytical Chemistry Laboratory, in Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online. HELMeTO 2020.23.22. Communications in Computer and Information Science (Eds. G. Fulantelli, D. Burgos, G. Casalino, M. Cimitile, G. Lo Bosco, D. Taibi), Springer Nature, 2023, vol 1779, 446-458 (https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/facingthe-didactic-emergency-during-covid-19-pandemic-in-an-ana/25303892).
  6. S. Zappoli, M. Venturi, E. Scavetta, A. Lesch, Sperimentazione di percorsi didattici innovativi in ambito universitario: due esempi, in I tanti volti della chimica – Percorsi innovativi per insegnarla e comprenderla (a cura di E. Aquilini, E. Ghibaudi, M. Venturi, G. Villani), CLUEB, Bologna, 2024, 357-375.
  7. M. Pickering, The teaching laboratory through history, J. Chem. Educ., 1993, 70, pp. 699-700.
  8. L. Perin, Ultimi dati su scienza e istruzione in Italia, con un focus su women e STEM, FBK Magazine, 27 febbraio 2024 (https://magazine.fbk.eu/it/news/ultimi-dati-su-scienza-e-istruzione-in-italia-con-un-focus-su-women-in-stem/).
  9. G. Fregonara, O. Riva, AlmaDiploma, quasi un diplomato su due è pentito della scuola scelta. E l’università la scelgono i genitori, Corriere della Sera, 29 febbraio 2024 (https://www.corriere.it/scuola/maturita/24_febbraio_29/almadiploma-quasi-diplomato-due-pentito-scuola-scelta-l-universita-scelgono-genitori-7be7562c-d653-11ee-a778-923fd35bfe17.shtml).